Re: Narrator summoning thread

by **Septon Arlyn** Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:02 pm

Nathaniel Mason wrote:Grats on a near perfect roll. I have found Orokos is kind to sneaky men of virtue.

I have found virtue they look kindly upon. Sneaky... Not so much Rolling Eyes

by Samurel Manderly Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:04 pm

Nathaniel Mason wrote:
Samurel Manderly wrote:I SUMMON THEE TO THIS MORTAL PLANE, READER, GOD AMONG GODS

viewtopic.php?f=173&
t=2085

Grats on a near perfect roll. I have found Orokos is kind to sneaky men of virtue.

Thank you sir, if anything is true, is that what is done in the dark will be brought to the light, but the light doesn't tend to be very good at the whole "
Bringing"
aspect of things xD. and yeah >
_>
, I've found my rolls doing quite well when I need them most, and not so well when the people I'm talking to are gonna find out eventually anyway (yourself included)

by **Nathaniel Mason** Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:04 pm

Septon Arlyn wrote:
Nathaniel Mason wrote:Grats on a near perfect roll. I have found Orokos is kind to sneaky men of virtue.

I have found virtue they look kindly upon. Sneaky... Not so much

Says the supposedly virtuous Septon who has yet to notice a sneaky man if he bit him.

by **Septon Arlyn** Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:09 pm

As it says in elder scrolls oblivion, "
it must have been the wind"

by **Lady Corrine Marsten** Thu Nov 26, 2015 1:22 am

Septon Arlyn wrote:
Nathaniel Mason wrote:Grats on a near perfect roll. I have found Orokos is kind to sneaky men of virtue.

I have found virtue they look kindly upon. Sneaky... Not so much

I would disagree. My final Empathy roll in the Prime Suspect thread shows the opposite.

by **Reader** Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:57 am

Lady Corrine Marsten wrote:
Septon Arlyn wrote:
Nathaniel Mason wrote:Grats on a near perfect roll. I have found Orokos is kind to sneaky men of virtue.

I have found virtue they look kindly upon. Sneaky... Not so much

I would disagree. My final Empathy roll in the Prime Suspect thread shows the opposite.

If only Samurel hadn't been there or the roll was a little poorer - based on previous evidence I could have trusted you to play a critical failure to the hilt. Smile

Samurel already proving his worth.

by **Lady Corrine Marsten** Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:24 pm

Reader wrote:

If only Samurel hadn't been there or the roll was a little poorer - based on previous evidence I could have trusted you to play a critical failure to the hilt.

Samurel already proving his worth.

Oh man, it would have been a disaster. Laughing

by **Loreia** Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:08 am

viewtopic.php?f=189&
t=2079&
p=59673&
hilit=assembly#p59011

Baelon wrote:[OOC: Sorry, just waiting on some Day 3 stuff to resolve before making an entrance - it could have a drastic effect on both the content and presentation. I suspect that might be the case for others. The discussion of evidence should probably wait until everyone who's going to be there have arrived.]

I think we're unclear on whether that Day 3 stuff has been resolved, especially if it has anything to do with the investigation.

by Marq Mooton Sat Nov 28, 2015 7:49 pm

viewtopic.php?f=173&
t=2127&
p=59753#p59753

by **Ereth Redwain** Sat Nov 28, 2015 7:51 pm

viewtopic.php?f=173&
t=2137

by **Nathaniel Mason** Sun Nov 29, 2015 6:04 am

Forthwind's research: viewtopic.php?f=181&
t=1813&
p=59351#p59351

Ser Niall: viewtopic.php?f=191&
t=2141&
p=60315#p60315

Finishing up Ser Myles thread: viewtopic.php?f=175&
t=2109&
p=60281#p60281

Has the Speech thread gone up yetÉ

by **Loreia** Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:36 pm

When you come back tomorrow, I'd like to get a response to the following post. This is how Daveth and I wanted to handle my little error. I never meant to roll more than 1 Destiny Point.

viewtopic.php?f=193&
t=2103&
start=30#p62289

References in Coldbrook-Drakeson forum
viewtopic.php?f=195&
t=1727&
p=59903&
hilit=loreia#p59903
viewtopic.php?f=195&
t=1727&
p=59903&
hilit=loreia#p60017

by Marq Mooton Thu Dec 03, 2015 8:50 pm

viewtopic.php?f=173&
t=2127&
p=61981#p61981

by **Yoren longshore** Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:11 pm

viewtopic.php?f=173&
t=2247
not sure if I want him to reply, but what's life without a risk?

by **Loreia** Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:48 am

Representatives of House Coldbrook and House Dulver(or unaffiliated?) request an audience with the heir of House Daleford.
viewtopic.php?f=189&
t=2249#p63597

by **Loreia** Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:27 pm

I have a question for you in my character thread.

by **Reader** Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:28 pm

Got through most of this and cleared my PM mountain, more IC stuff tomorrow, including the fun of Yoren's follow-up question. Twisted Evil

by **Loreia** Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:04 am

viewtopic.php?f=191&
t=2274#p64055

It's been brought up that several armors have gabesons or brigandines included as worn underneath ringmail or plate. Arlyn's wearing his vestments over his ring mail, the validity of stacking the two has been contested. Narrator ruling and inclusion in the house rules thread would be very much appreciated. Also, needed before we can continue.

by **Septon Arlyn** Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:09 am

[url:3so6db1u]http:
//roninarmy.
com/threads/3866-Layering-Armor[/url:3so6db1u]

just as a follow up I posed the question to the green ronin form, Along with my rational

by **Reader** Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:19 pm

Loreia wrote:http://dragonsdance.forumatic.com/viewtopic.php?f=191&
t=2274#p64055

It's been brought up that several armors have gabesons or brigandines included as worn underneath ringmail or plate. Arlyn's wearing his vestments over his ring mail, the validity of stacking the two has been contested. Narrator ruling and inclusion in the house rules thread would be very much appreciated. Also, needed before we can continue.

As noted in the mechanics thread, this is a no, and hopefully doesn't need added to the House Rules thread..

Nice try through Septon. :;
):

by **Septon Arlyn** Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:33 pm

It was also brought up that battleaxe age athletics +1 and adaptable, do they have a training requirement for use or can we just say that he was using a mace + shield

by **Nathaniel Mason** Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:37 pm

Battle Axe does not have a training requirement.

Bastard sword does, which is why it got Powerful when two handed when Battle Axe was improved.

by **Reader** Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:46 pm

Nathaniel Mason wrote:Battle Axe does not have a training requirement.

Bastard sword does, which is why it got Powerful when two handed when Battle Axe was improved.

What he said.

by **Baelon Drakeson** Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:57 pm

It does when two-handed
[url:2fy5kip5]http:
//dragonsdance.
forumatic.
com/viewtopic.
php?f=79&
t=23#p11409[/url:2fy5kip5]

by **Nathaniel Mason** Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:57 am

viewtopic.php?f=185&
t=2293&
p=64411#p64411

by Sponsored content